My thoughts on the two articles of Babylonian Numerics
In my mind, an hour is always a circle (same as a regular clock) and time is measured in 15 minutes or a quarter of a circle. After reading the Lombardi's article, I was surprised that an hour was not a empirically constant unit of time measurement. It made logical sense that people treated day and night as separate entities where each had 12 hours. It's suggested that Hipparchus introduced 24-hour day around 147 B.C., so people over a millennium had to work out the seasonally varying length of an hour. Another surprising snippet was the usage of clepsydra mentioned in Lombardi's article. This is a fascinating way where fluid dynamics is used as a substitute as sun light or lack of during night.
Lombardi stated in his article that the base 60 was first invented by Sumerian, which then passed down to Babylonian, which then passed down to Greek. However, the reason of 60 was unknown. In O'Connor and Roberston's article, they had a different hypothesis about the reason of a base-60 system. A person can learn to count to six by counting 12 using one hand (thumb to count 12 joints of other finger) and then 5 using the other hand. My view is that O'Connor and Roberston's theory makes sense since ancient counting without any tools solely relies on human's hands.
Thanks for the thoughtful reflection, Raymond. Interesting observation that you associate the concept of an hour with the physical shape of the clock. As a practicing teacher, I've noticed that over the years, more and more students are unable to read the analog clock as they are so used to reading time from their phones. I wonder how that affects students' concept of an hour!
ReplyDelete